Cycling workouts by zone
Six zones, eight sessions worth actually riding, and a running reminder that every watt target below is one estimated number multiplied by a fraction, so being precise about it past roughly the nearest ten watts is mostly false comfort.
Sweet spot for volume, threshold when you have the legs for it, VO2max once a week at most, and everything else genuinely easy. The numbers below are worked at a 200W FTP and the tool rewrites them at yours.
The zones are percentages of one number
Every zone model in every app is the same shape, which is a set of percentage bands drawn across your FTP, so the whole table shifts the moment that number does and none of the boundaries mean anything on their own. A rider at 200W and a rider at 300W doing the same named session are riding pretty different watts, and the named session is the thing they have in common rather than the effort.
Worked at a 200W FTP. Put your own number in and every figure on this page is rewritten.
Sweet spot is the odd one out in that list because it is not really a zone, it is a name somebody gave to the top of tempo and the bottom of threshold, sitting somewhere around 88 to 94%, and it exists because that band gives you most of the training effect of threshold work for noticeably less of the wreckage afterwards.
The sessions worth riding
Almost every structured plan I have looked at is some arrangement of these eight, and the differences between plans are usually about how much of each and in what order rather than about the workouts themselves being different.
How much of this in a week
Two hard days is the answer almost everyone lands on, and the reason is not that three is forbidden but that the third one usually turns the easy days into medium days to pay for it, and then you are riding a week of tempo without having decided to. So a fairly normal week is one sweet spot or threshold session, one VO2max session if you are close to a race and probably not if you are not, and everything else genuinely easy.
The easy rides are the part people get wrong, and I include myself here, since zone 2 at a 200W FTP tops out around 150W and it is very easy to sit at 170 and tell yourself that is basically the same thing. It is not, and the cost does not show up on the easy ride, it shows up on rep three of the interval session two days later.
The precision is mostly fake
Take the whole table and remember where it came from, which is you riding twenty minutes hard once and multiplying by 0.95, or riding a ramp and multiplying by 0.75, and those two protocols will usually disagree with each other by ten or twenty watts on the same day. So a target of 232W is not meaningfully different from 235W, and my trainer and my pedals disagree by about 3% anyway, which is more than the gap between two of the bands up there.
What I would actually do with a session that is going badly is drop to the bottom of the range and finish it, rather than hold the number and blow up, because the number was roughly right at best and the completed session is worth more than the honest failure. And if that keeps happening then the FTP is probably set high, which is a setting you can just change.
Retest every six to eight weeks or so, keep to one protocol, and keep to one power meter, since a ramp in March against a twenty-minute test in June is mostly measuring the difference between two fudge factors.